GREETINGS! First, Here's an update from Washington, D.C. In February, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposed the creation of an array of new user fees to fund the U.S. Air Transportation
System. Much of the industry gave the proposal a 'thumbs down,' with a key exception being the Air Transport Association,
which a year earlier had released a position paper that was very similar to the subsequent FAA proposal. Airports
want the cap on passenger facility charges (PFCs) raised and indexed for inflation. User groups (other than the
airlines) are essentially calling for the status quo.
It is up to Congress to make the final determination on how to fund the system while also modernizing the Air Traffic
Control System the need for which all parties agree.
Meanwhile, another debate has emerged involving money a rates and charges showdown at Los Angeles International
Airport that could have-lasting repercussions for airports and their tenants. In the final analysis, it is all
a moving target, at best.
Second, The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation approved S.1300, the Aviation Investment
and Modernization Act of 2007, which authorizes FAA and other programs through 2011. The U.S. House had yet to
come forward with its reauthorization bill.
Comments NATA, "The Senate's FAA reauthorization largely maintains the status quo…" It does not make
changes to current aviation taxes, which fall under the domain of the Senate Committee on Finance. Here are some
key S.1300 provisions:
o Establishes an Air Traffic Modernization Fund, which will collect a $25 surcharge for all commercial and turbine-powered flights.
o Creates an ATC Oversight Board, made up of government and industry representatives, and authorizes the Department of Transportation to borrow funds via bonds for ATC capital projects to facilitate modernization.
o Increases Airport Improvement Program funding levels, starting with $3.8 billion in 2008, and ending with $4.1 billion in 2011.
S.1300, however, does not raise the cap on PFCs, which, with the exception
of ATA, is generally supported by industry. It is at the top of the airport groups' wish list, and FAA had proposed
raising the cap from the current $4.50 to $6.00, but not indexed for inflation.
The Senate bill does call for a pilot program to allow up to six airports to charge their cap and to collect the
fees themselves.
Thirdly, Here is an update concerning Missouri Aviation. The only Airport and Aviation Bills are as follows:
94th General Assembly, 1st Regular Session (2007)
Bills Indexed by Subject
AIRCRAFT AND AIRPORTS
HB
118 --- Sponsor: Schaaf, Robert
Specifies the situations in which the Civil Air Patrol may be activated, which missions are federal or state, and
who pays for the missions
HB
302 --- Sponsor: Bruns, Mark J. --- CoSponsor:
Schaaf,
Robert
Relating to State Aviation Trust Funds and air traffic control towers partially funded by the federal government
under a cost-sharing program
HB
305 --- Sponsor: Bruns, Mark J. --- CoSponsor:
Page,
Sam
Increases the limit on the amount deposited to the aviation trust fund to eight million five hundred thousand dollars
HB
529 --- Sponsor: Bruns, Mark J.
Changes the laws regarding the Aviation Trust Fund and air traffic control towers
HB
571 --- Sponsor: St. Onge, Neal C. ---
CoSponsor: Schneider,
Vicki
Changes the definition of "commercial aircraft" by lowering the maximum certified gross take-off weight
from 7,000 to 1,000 pounds
HB
619 --- Sponsor: Aull, Joe --- CoSponsor:
Schaaf,
Robert
Specifies the situations in which the Civil Air Patrol may be activated, which missions are federal or state, and
who pays for the missions
HB
624 --- Sponsor: Wilson, Larry --- CoSponsor:
Quinn,
Paul
Requires operators of storage facilities to provide documentation for property tax purposes
SB 120 --- Sponsor: Nodler, Gary
Increases the cap on the Aviation Trust Fund and allows the Aviation Trust Fund to be used for certain federal
air traffic control cost-sharing programs
SB 602 --- Sponsor: Kennedy, Harry
Creates a sales and use tax exemption for purchases of aviation fuel for transoceanic flights
Note: Here's your web site address for Texas Legislation: www.texas.gov.
Look for Transportation-Aviation, to search all Aviation Bills.
Note: Here's your web site address for Illinois Legislation: www.illinois.gov.
Look for Transportation-Aviation, to search all Aviation Bills.
Now, In Conclusion, Remember, we as USPA, MPA, EAA, AOPA, or any other State Pilot Associations of which you may
be a member, all have a powerful voice, be it here in Missouri, Indiana, Texas, or whatever state you may represent.
Every group of pilots and taxpayers carries a strong voice to Washington, D.C., and on the State and Local Level.
So Let's not forget to exercise our privileges, and continue to make a "Difference for General Aviation."
SAFE FLYING!
Larry G. Harmon
Legislation Chairman
E-mail address: MPALHARMON228@aol.com

Who represents me in Jefferson City?
Back to Larry's Main Page
Back to the current President's Main Page